Category: UK Employment Rights
The Right To Strike: The Heart Of Worker Empowerment
By IndustriALL Global Union General Secretary, Atle Høie
The right to strike and the right to organize are fundamental pillars of worker empowerment, enshrined in International Labour Organization (ILO) Conventions 87 and 98. These rights are essential for workers and unions to protect their interests and assert their power against the enormous economic and political influence of employers. Without the ability to strike, workers are left defenseless in wage negotiations, working conditions, and basic workplace dignity.
At the core of these protections is the right to organize. This right allows employees to unite and advocate collectively on shared issues.
However, in some parts of the world union discrimination is widespread. Even companies that engage in collective bargaining resist unionization efforts where they can, undermining the fundamental rights of their workers. A striking example is the recent action by IndustriALL affiliate United Auto Workers (UAW), which filed federal labour charges against former US President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk.
The charges accuse them of illegally threatening and intimidating workers who stand up for their rights by engaging in strikes. This case underlines the ongoing global struggle for labour rights, even at companies with significant international influence. Tesla, a company notorious for its anti-union stance, employs over 120,000 workers worldwide yet refuses to engage in collective bargaining.
Attempts to organize within Tesla have been met with fierce resistance, with Elon Musk himself threatening retaliation against workers who attempt to unionize. This has led to significant tensions with labour unions, particularly in Sweden. Swedish union IF Metall became the first to take action against Tesla’s anti-union practices, initiating industrial action on 27th October 2023 in 12 Tesla-owned garages and expanding to 20 more locations. Despite brief negotiations in November last year, Tesla remained steadfast in its refusal to sign a collective agreement. The company’s management has dismissed labour rights, arguing that they are not part of “the company’s concept.” Elon Musk has publicly criticized unions, claiming they create division and negativity within companies. IndustriALL general secretary, Atle Høie, says: “Elon Musk’s business model is one that is designed to avoid respecting human rights. We must defend workers and the rights that they have fought so long for. We stand with the UAW in their fight.”
This conflict is not just about Tesla and its workers—it is a symbol of the broader battle for labour rights and the critical importance of the freedom to organize and strike. Without these rights, workers around the world remain vulnerable to exploitation and injustice.
The right to strike is not just a tool—it is a crucial defense that ensures workers can stand up for themselves and each other.
50 Years Of The Health & Safety At Work Act
By Shelly Asquith, Health, Safety & Wellbeing Officer in the TUC Organisation, Skills and Services Department.
50 years ago today, one of the first new laws of a newly elected Labour government was the Health and Safety at Work Act.Half a century on, what is the legacy? And what do we need now as another Labour government takes office?
Ever since the Trades Union Congress was established, in 1868, we have fought to protect workers.
When, just over a century later, we saw health and safety at work regulation enshrined in law, it was a welcome move: A new agency that could prosecute employers who failed to keep work safe represented a serious deterrent, and one we would not have seen were it not for union pressure.
Since then, the number of fatal injuries at work has fallen by over 80 per cent, from 651 deaths in 1974 to 138 this year.
A foundation to build on, one might think. Instead, over time, the main work safety regulators have been systematically de-funded and defanged.
So much so that you are now more likely to win the lottery than have a safety inspector visit your workplace. Fewer inspectors, inspections and actions against employers – especially so during the Covid crisis, that saw thousands of workers die following exposure at work. The austerity-hit HSE has had a 54 per cent cut in funding, and in local authorities the picture is even worse.
In turn, we are seeing a surge in occupational ill-health. While fewer workers die from injuries on the job, many suffer the effects of occupational cancers or work-related stress. In fact, an estimated 50,000 people in Britain lose their life to work causes every year. Despite all the rules and regulations, employers still cut corners, prioritising profit over people’s lives.
All the while, it has remained our unions that we rely on to keep work safe. As our formal protections are undermined and eroded, it’s not the law we turn to, but each other.
When the TUC undertook a study in the Covid pandemic, comparing workplaces with safety reps and those without, we found workplaces with union reps were 20 per cent more likely to have the right PPE, and 40 per cent more likely to have had a risk assessment shared with the workforce.
Trade union health and safety reps are the most effective guard against hazardous work, the only reliable regulation in the workplace. Much of the activities of safety reps goes on in the background, and it cannot be overstated the difference we can make, influencing risk management and representing colleagues.
Sometimes, too, we demonstrate that the right to withdraw our labour is our ultimate leverage, far beyond the words of an Act or the warnings of an unlikely inspection.
In the last year we have seen industrial action get the goods. Where management failed to recognise safety concerns raised by unions, we saw housing workers strike over asbestos exposure, on the railways a strike over long hours causing fatigue, and in one local authority, an indefinite walkout over access to sick pay.
In all these cases, the workers won.
The 1974 Act was not a magic wand, and the existing legislation does not go far enough. For example, unions are still seeking greater rights for reps, guaranteed access to workplaces where we have members, explicit protection from specific hazards like working in extreme heat, the recognition of work-related suicide.
The list goes on. The TUC will continue to make the case for more resources in workplace health and safety – strong unions, effective regulation, and justice for all those entitled to it.
What’s more, if the Act, in its 50th year, is going to be worth more than the paper it’s written on, then we need a regulator, an enforcer, that functions. We need a properly funded HSE and stronger rights for union safety reps, starting with repealing the anti-strike laws that limit our ability to act in the face of danger.
While governments and Ministers can be reshuffled or unseated overnight, an organised working class is far harder to replace or beat.
Legislation is important, but unions are vital. That’s why, to mark the 50th year of a law designed to improve our safety, we are focusing our efforts on engaging the frontline, not the frontbench: By finding, training and retaining hundreds of new union health and safety reps.
With an ageing profile of existing reps, we are especially looking for young union members to take on the role, so that they might play their part in keeping workers safe for the next 50 years.
TUC Poll Shows Big Support For New Deal For Workers
First week back in Parliament and a handful Tories took to the airwaves, shell shocked staggering into TV studios to turn the clock back to the late 1990s predicting job losses, company failures and the end of the world as Labour begins the implementation process of the New Deal For Workers.
Interviewers brushed aside their limp arguments and can now point to a new TUC poll of 3,000 voters showing huge backing across the political spectrum for improving protections at work and for the fundamental policies that underpin Labour’s New Deal for working people.
The polling reveals what voters thought about Labour’s key employment right policies:
- Implementing a real living wage: Three-quarters (77%) of 2024 voters support Labour’s commitment to ensure that the national minimum wage rises to be a real living wage.
- Strengthening unfair dismissal: Nearly 2 in 3 (64%) of all 2024 election voters support the day one right to protection from unfair dismissal.
- Making sick pay a day 1 right: Nearly 7 in 10 voters (69%) back Labour’s plan to make statutory sick pay available from the first day of sickness.
- Ban on fire and rehire: Two-thirds (66%) of voters support a ban on fire and rehire.
- Ban on zero hours contracts: Nearly 7 in 10 (67%) voters support banning zero-hours contracts by offering all workers a contract that reflects their normal hours of work and compensation for cancelled shifts.
And there is majority support for collective rights too, including:
- Union access to workplaces: 2024 voters by a margin over two to one (46% in favour, 19% against) support giving trade unions a right to access workplaces to tell workers about the benefits of joining a trade union.
- Voters across the political spectrum want work to pay and to feel secure and respected in their jobs. Labour’s workers’ rights plans are hugely popular, and this poll should give ministers confidence to get on with delivering them in full.
- Working people want a government that is on their side and that will improve the quality of work in this country. After 14 years of stagnating living standards, the UK needs to turn the page on our low-rights, low-pay economy that has allowed good employers to be undercut by the bad.