UPDATED: ILO Refers Dispute Over The Right To Strike To International Court

In a crucial decision, the ILO Governing Body has voted in favour of seeking a resolution from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) over a long-standing dispute between workers’ and employers’ representatives related to the right to strike.

ILO jurisprudence effectively means that the right to strike derives under international law from ILO Conventions 87 (Freedom of Association) and 98 (Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining).

For nearly 10 years, there has been an impasse on the issue at the ILO between the worker representatives, who support the ILO jurisprudence, and the representatives of employers. Under the ILO Constitution, questions such as this can be sent to the ICJ.

In the vote held on 10 November, 19 government representatives on the Governing Body voted with the 14 worker delegates to send the issue to the ICJ. Just seven voted with the employer group, which also has 14 members, while two governments abstained.

Professor Keith Ewing, President of The Campaign For Trade Union Freedom said: “Although this is a move not without risk, it is essential nevertheless that the existence and scope of the right to strike are settled once and for all, and that national governments take steps fully to implement their international obligations.”

“The P&O affair reminds us why the right to strike in the widest terms is necessary if employer abuse is to be contained. The British government has been condemned again by the ILO Freedom of Association Committee for the pitiful state of British labour law, revealing the challenge for the ICJ if the gap between international law and national practice is to be closed”.

ITUC General Secretary Luc Triangle said: “The right to strike is fundamental for workers to get a fair deal and, as history shows, for democracy. We welcome this decision and look forward to putting our case to the ICJ. We are confident that this process will validate the decades of ILO jurisprudence on the right to strike in international law.”

Posted in Campaign For Trade Union Freedom News, European Employment Rights, International Employment Rights, UK Employment Rights, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

ILO Rebukes UK Government Over Failures On P&O Ferries Scandal

TUC, Nautilus, RMT, ITF and ITUC have issued joint statement about the prospect of another P&O Ferries scandal without stronger labour laws

The UN workers’ rights watchdog, the ILO, has rebuked the UK government over failures following the P&O Ferries scandal, in which 800 seafarers were sacked illegally – and demanded that the UK beef up worker protections.

The ILO has called on the UK to increase sanctions on companies that ignore the law and ensure that workers can get their jobs back.

This ruling from the ILO’s committee on freedom of association follows a complaint by the TUC, Nautilus, RMT – and international union bodies the ETF and ITF, and ITUC.

This is the second time in months that the ILO has reprimanded the UK government.
In the summer, the UN workers’ rights watchdog slammed the UK’s anti-union drive and called on ministers to bring UK union laws into line with international law.

The TUC has also recently reported the Conservative government to the ILO’s committee of experts over the imposition of the draconian Strikes Act.

Joint union statement
The TUC, Nautilus and RMT have issued a scathing joint statement in the wake of the ruling, warning about the prospect of another P&O Ferries scandal if ministers fail to beef up protections.

Warning about another P&O Ferries scandal, the unions say:
“Today’s ruling by the UN workers’ rights watchdog – the ILO – highlights the government’s failure to impose proper sanctions on P&O Ferries and DP World.
“There is nothing to stop another P&O Ferries scandal from happening again under current UK law.
“Having feigned outrage at P&O Ferries’ actions, ministers have rowed back on their promise to clamp down on bad bosses and introduce a much-needed employment bill.
Criticising the failure of government to act in the wake of the scandal, the unions say:
“P&O Ferries’ brutal sacking of 800 dedicated seafarers in March 2022 was one of the most shocking episodes in modern industrial relations.
“Despite admitting acting illegally, P&O Ferries have faced no sanctions and have been let off the hook for their appalling treatment of staff.
“Conservative ministers haven’t lifted a finger. They should have come down like a tonne of bricks on P&O Ferries and their parent company, DP World.
“Instead they have they have spent at least £600,000 on P&O Ferries’ services, offered lucrative freeport contracts to DP World, and turned a blind eye to P&O Ferries’ disgraceful behaviour.
On the ruling, the unions say: “As the ILO makes clear, this can’t go on. Without a proper sanctions regime, rogue employers like P&O Ferries will continue to get away with treating staff like disposable labour.
“We need to drag our outdated employment laws into the 21st century.
“This is why we need a new deal for working people – like Labour is proposing – to ensure that everybody is treated with dignity and respect at work.
“For too long parts of our labour market have been like the wild west – with some seafarers particularly exposed to hyper-exploitation and a lack of enforceable rights.
“Secure and fair work is vital for a healthy, and prosperous workforce and for a thriving economy.”

Full joint union statement:
P&O Ferries’ brutal sacking of 800 dedicated seafarers in March 2022 was one of the most shocking episodes in modern industrial relations.
Despite admitting acting illegally, P&O Ferries have faced no sanctions and have been let off the hook for their appalling treatment of staff.
Conservative ministers haven’t lifted a finger. They should have come down like a tonne of bricks on P&O Ferries and their parent company, DP World.
Instead they have they have spent at least £600,000 on P&O Ferries’ services, offered lucrative freeport contracts to DP World, and turned a blind eye to P&O Ferries’ disgraceful behaviour.
There is nothing to stop another P&O Ferries scandal from happening again under current UK law.
Having feigned outrage at P&O Ferries’ actions, ministers have rowed back on their promise to clamp down on bad bosses and introduce a much-needed employment bill.
As the ILO makes clear, this can’t go on. Without a proper sanctions regime, rogue employers like P&O Ferries will continue to get away with treating staff like disposable labour.
We need to drag our outdated employment laws into the 21st century.
This is why we need a new deal for working people – like Labour is proposing – to ensure that everybody is treated with dignity and respect at work.
For too long parts of our labour market have been like the wild west – with some seafarers particularly exposed to hyper-exploitation and a lack of enforceable rights.
Secure and fair work is vital for a healthy, and prosperous workforce and for a thriving economy.

TUC, ITF, ITUC, Nautilus, RMT

Posted in Campaign For Trade Union Freedom News, European Employment Rights, International Employment Rights, UK Employment Rights, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Swedish ‘Fin-Tech’ Company Agrees Union Recognition As Dispute With Tesla Escalates

Swedish ‘fintech’ company Klarna, which employs 5000 workers, has averted an all out strike by its workforce and agreed to union recognition and a collective bargaining agreement with Swedish unions.

The internet finance platform which provides financial services for online stores and post-purchase payments is popular with  millennials and Generation Z who are switching to ‘buy now, pay later’ as their preferred method of payment due to high interest rates.

The Klarna Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) could prove a watershed for Swedish unions organising in tech firms and is seen as a major breakthough in the sector.

Unions hope that it will lead to similar deals in tech companies notably at the music streaming and podcast platform Spotify.

Swedish unions were in discussions with Spotify and were hopeful of securing a deal until  the company pulled out of the talks in August saying that a Collective Bargaining Agreement did not fit in with their business model.

In Sweden nine out of ten employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreements but they are less common in in startup and tech companies. Globally tech companies have a history of avoiding unonisation and collective bargaining.

The Klarna CBA now recognises three unions, Finansförbundet (which is part of Unionen), Engineers of Sweden, and Akavia.

Unions who accused Klarna of repeatedly cancelling and postponing meetings, called for strike action due to take place on November 7th.

Sen Kanner, president of Unionen, said: “I hope that this will show tech companies that they have a place in the Swedish model and there are only benefits to unionising and working alongside your employees. I really hope this will be the start of a new trend for tech companies in Sweden and globally.”

Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski said: “I am pleased that we have reached an agreement that combines Klarna’s agility with the clarity of the Swedish model. Our focus in the negotiations has been to secure operational freedom, to continue to make quick decisions and to continue to cultivate our unique and successful culture.”

Unions Fight To Defend ‘The Swedish Model’ At Tesla.

The Swedish IF Mettal union is also currently in dispute with US e-vehicle maker Tesla over union recognition and collective bargaining. Tesla refuse to agree to union recogntion and collective bargaing for  130 mechanics who maintain and repair vehicles. They are are now on strike and are being supported by other unions including dock workers who are refusing to unload Tesla vehicles being imported into the country; the painters union who are refusing to service Tesla’s and the Service and Communications Employees, who said it will halt shipments to Tesla on November 20th.

Serice union president Gabriella Lavecchia, said Tesla is “refusing to comply with the rules of the game here in Sweden. The fight that IF Metall is now taking on is important for the entire Swedish collective agreement model.”

Sweden is highly unionised, has highly regulated employment laws and sector wide collective bargaining which has the support of the public and which stops the ‘race to the bottom’.

Decent wages and working conditions apply across the economy and there is a settled concensus between employers, government and unions on the value of the Swedish model while tech company’s and businesses like Tesla see the Swedish model as damaging ‘flexibility’ as well unfettered profits and the wealth of CEOs and executives.

Posted in Campaign For Trade Union Freedom News, European Employment Rights, International Employment Rights, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Letter of solidarity to PGFTU

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment